Media analysts Hitchens, Cockburn and Jenkins speak out against inhumane and counterproductive drone strikes

Peter Hitchens asks: “ How does David Cameron square his liberal opposition to the death penalty with executing people without trial in the middle of someone else’s desert?

Patrick Cockburn wryly comments in the Independent that stupid and arrogant political leaders in the US and Britain use drone warfare because it shows them as apparently effective against evil-doers – and avoids the public backlash caused by soldiers coming back in coffins. They stoutly deny the all too visible evidence that drone warfare does not wipe out resistance but inflames and recruits the angry young terrorists – or resistance fighters.

In September 2011, in Yemen, propaganda cited the drone killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen who was one of the leaders of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) as a high point in its counter-terrorist campaign, but four years later Cockburn points out, AQAP has become stronger than it has ever been, spreading through Yemen and capturing a port city.

Sir Simon Jenkins once again writes powerfully, denouncing air-strikes as a ‘cruel delusion, a pretence of humanity, immoral and stupid’, In the days of conventional war, when international law was still observed to some extent, he points out that such ‘casual slaughter’ would have had an infantry unit court-martialled and jailed.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Airstrikes, Armed drones, Civilian deaths, Drone strikes, drones, Human rights, UK, US, Yemen and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s