Military analysts ask if the rise in the use of drones is desirable in terms of global security

 

Mark Shapiro sends news of Chris Cole’s review of a book by Ann Rogers and John Hill: Unmanned: Drone Warfare and Global Security. See the whole article here.

janes intelligence review headerAnn Rogers and John Hill write for Jane’s Intelligence Review, owned by IHS, a global consultancy covering many sectors including defence and security intelligence.

Chris Cole  writes:

“Chapter by chapter the book investigates the key aspects of the use of armed drones including tracing their history, the effect on military doctrine, ethical and legal issues, the impact on the ground and the push towards greater autonomy.

unmanned - drone cover“Drones, the book contends, are helping to normalise the use of States “targeting individuals with military-scale force” and blurring the lines between law enforcement and military action giving rise to what the authors call nano-wars. They state: “the serious battering of just war conventions by US drone strikes contributes to a new set of norms that are likely to be regressive to the causes of peace and international stability.

“The book argues that in certain cases just because drones can be used to target individuals, they are being used whether this is effective in achieving the overall goals of creating security or not. In fact the authors argue in Pakistan and Yemen not only are the strikes failing to isolate the insurgency from the population, they are antagonising populations and radicalising the “pre-insurgent” and it is perhaps the US who is becoming increasing isolated from the international community over the strikes . . .

“While some accounts from drone pilots are beginning to leak out, the reality of the drone wars from the perspective of the drone pilot is still to be voiced . . . “

Cole ends: “The final question the book poses is whether the rise in use of drones is desirable in terms of global security. The authors – along with more and more people around the globe – conclude that they are not”.


A version of this review originally appeared in Peace News but is not yet on its website.

 –

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Armed drones, Drone strikes, Human rights, International law, Pakistan, USA, Yemen and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s